Recipra: Difference between revisions
Initial source-linked scientific wiki setup |
Add complete multilingual reference and language navigation |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="wiki-language-nav" style="padding:0.75em; border:1px solid #b5c8cd; border-radius:0.5em; margin-bottom:1em;">[[Recipra|English]] · [[Recipra/uk|Українська]] · [[Recipra/es|Español]] · [[Recipra/fr|Français]] · [[Recipra/de|Deutsch]] · [[Recipra/pt|Português]]</div> | |||
= Recipra = | = Recipra = | ||
'''Recipra''' is presented as a conceptual proposal from the development of Vision 2035 Revision 2027. Valentyn Shapovalov's article ''Recipra as a Proposed Successor to Ethics (An Advance Contribution from Vision 2035 Revision 2027)'' was published on '''4 October 2026''' in ''Conceptual Future'', 1(1), 27–34. | '''Recipra''' is presented as a conceptual proposal from the development of Vision 2035 Revision 2027. Valentyn Shapovalov's article ''Recipra as a Proposed Successor to Ethics (An Advance Contribution from Vision 2035 Revision 2027)'' was published on '''4 October 2026''' in ''Conceptual Future'', 1(1), 27–34. | ||
Latest revision as of 00:52, 12 November 2026
Recipra
Recipra is presented as a conceptual proposal from the development of Vision 2035 Revision 2027. Valentyn Shapovalov's article Recipra as a Proposed Successor to Ethics (An Advance Contribution from Vision 2035 Revision 2027) was published on 4 October 2026 in Conceptual Future, 1(1), 27–34.
The proposal emphasizes reciprocal accountability: the ability of a less powerful party to obtain justification, challenge a decision and secure correction without first matching the authority's resources. It discusses duties concerning evidence, access, review, remedy and freedom of association.
Status: proposed framework and research agenda. The article acknowledges an unresolved difficulty when a powerful actor can refuse every review mechanism. This page does not present Recipra as an established universal replacement for ethics or a validated intervention.